This week our class looked at WTS 2.4: Adapt to Change (Technology fluency): Transfer current knowledge to new and emerging technologies. The topic and tag of the week was change. Andy Warhol said,
“They always say time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself”
The Passage of Time
Those of us who are not digital natives(me!) have had to embrace countless technological changes and it only makes sense that there will be many more to come. Even the natives are forced to adapt to frequent change; from the somewhat mundane in the form of new operating systems and software upgrades, to a myriad of exciting new web 2.0 tools.
The Future of the Internet III (2008) discusses the key findings from the Pew Internet & American Life Project that asked respondents to assess predictions about technology and its roles in the year 2020. This survey of internet leaders, activists, and analysts shows they expect major tech advances as the phone becomes a primary device for online access, voice-recognition improves, artificial and virtual reality become more embedded in everyday life, and the architecture of the internet itself improves. They disagree about whether these advances will lead to more social tolerance, more forgiving human relations, or better home lives (pretty heady expectations for technology, if you ask me). Here are the key findings:
The mobile device will be the primary connection tool to the internet for most people in the world in 2020.
The transparency of people and organizations will increase, but that will not necessarily yield more personal integrity, social tolerance, or forgiveness.
Voice recognition and touch user-interfaces with the internet will be more prevalent and accepted by 2020.
Those working to enforce intellectual property law and copyright protection will remain in a continuing arms race, with the crackers who will find ways to copy and share content without payment.
The divisions between personal time and work time and between physical and virtual reality will be further erased for everyone who is connected, and the results will be mixed in their impact on basic social relations.
Next-generation engineering of the network to improve the current internet architecture is more likely than an effort to rebuild the architecture from scratch.
As a vehicle to facilitate our Ethernet discussion, we watched a 12 minute video on 6th Sense Technology that gives an amazing glimpse of the wonders we can expect in the near future. Pranav Mistry, the brilliant inventor, based his work on the idea of taking the digital world out into the physical world. I immediately thought of the benefits this technology could offer in the realm of healthcare and nursing education. We are always reminding students to “look at the patient, not just the monitor” and with 6th sense technology, the patient could become the monitor. Wow! Pranav says he will open-source the technology behind 6th sense, making its possibilities available for everyone.
This week we focused on WTS 2.3: Select and Use Applications: Use productivity tools and common applications effectively and constructively. The topic was support and the tag of the week was productivity. The bookmarks on delicious and websites shared on etherpad offered many comprehensive lists of tools and applications to increase productivity and support education. A couple of my favorites :
Back to School with the class of web 2.0 This 3 part article gives a great comprehensive overview of web 2.0 for education. Part 1 covers web 2.0 tools such as organizers, grade-books, math (take note all you math teachers), learning & research, to-dos, note-taking, resume building, and media sharing. Part 2 discusses web-based alternatives to desktop office applications including: word processing, presentations, diagrams, spreadsheets, and more. The author then goes on to compare all of the web-based word processors for use in education. He determines that none of the available applications are quite ready yet–they are lacking specific formatting options, etc.; however, they do allow collaborative editing, document sharing, and online storage giving them potential benefits. Part 3 gives real cases of web 2.0 used in classrooms around the world and covers blogging, podcasting, media sharing, and wikis. Links to all the tools and applications discussed are provided as well as helpful descriptions & comparisons.
The Ultimate Student Resource List with tons of tools and applications all geared toward education and making students more productive and relaxed. The site is organized in a way that’s easy to follow and everything on the list is free. Yes, free.
Directory of Learning Tools from the Centre for Learning and Performance Technologies has over 3100 tools listed in 25 categories. The page on podcasting tools include those for subscribing to and listening to podcasts as well as creating and delivering podcasts.
Podcasts? Well, this week, we were also supposed to explore podcasting. Boulos, Maramba, & Wheeler (2006) describe many educational applications of podcasting and videocasting, including:
Recordings of lectures for those students unable to attend the lecture in person
Audio recordings of textbook content by chapter allowing students to “read” or review texts while walking or driving to class (can be significant aid for auditory learners)
Downloadable libraries of high resolution heart and respiratory sounds for healthcare students.
Accessing lectures and textbooks while driving, riding, or walking would certainly allow an increase in productivity.
This last one (CVMD) allows students to listen to heart sounds and examine ECG strips over and over again if they want to without bothering any patients. Now that is productive and supportive!
Reference:
Kamel Boulos, M. N., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs, and podcasts: A new generation of web based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BioMed Central Medical Education, 6(41), Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/6/41.
This week our class focused on WTS 2.1: Practice Safety: Demonstrate safe, legal, and ethical behavior in the use of information and technology. There were two tags-of-the-week: online safety, and copyright. In Education for a Digital World, McGuire (2008) defines intellectual property and states that copyright applies to and protects creative work. In the US, copyright protection is automatic. McGuire discusses two problems that occur when instructors are unfamiliar with copyright law: 1)when 3rd party materials are used without regard to copyright law, the institution is exposed to serious liability, and 2) instructors often fail to utilize beneficial materials because they believe copyright prohibits the use or that the process of obtaining permission would be too arduous. McGuire reassures instructors that the process of seeking permission to use 3rd party materials is often quite simple and may allow a dialogue to develop between the creator and consumer, “Often, academic authors are only interested in how their works are used” (p. 254). The networking involved in seeking permission may lead to an author offering the use of unpublished materials or other resources.
I know that I am somewhat unclear about copyright as it applies to the internet. I mean, is providing a link and giving credit to the author/site enough? With all the people making their own youtube videos and using music on their social networking sites, there is a lot of confusion over copyright and re-mixing. I would like to (legally) use some music for a video I am creating for this class. Michael RobbGreico created a music video for the Temple University Media Education Lab
explaining copyright and then posted it on youtube to help alleviate some of the confusion. You can download lesson plans along with the video to use with students to facilitate a discussion about copyright. The video sings that the most important function of copyright is, “Balancing rights of users and owners of intellectual property.” Of course, now I’ve got the song stuck in my head!
Another fabulous resource for copyright is the Berkman Center for Internet and Society Part of Harvard Law School, the Berkman Center was founded to explore cyberspace, share in its study, and help pioneer its development. The Berkman Center is involved in an unbelievable number of projects dealing with copyright issues: creative commons, copyright for librarians, citizen media law project, and noank media to name a few. They are also a partner in the Internet Safety Technical Task Force.
The Internet Safety Technical Task Forceexamined the extent of the threats children face on social networking sites and reported to 47 State Attorneys General. The report concluded that the problem of bullying among children, both online and offline, poses a far more serious challenge than the sexual solicitation of minors by adults that has received so much media attention.“Social networks are very much like real-world communities that are comprised mostly of good people who are there for the right reasons.”
An article at Safe-teens.comBack to School Advice for Safe and Ethical Social Networking states that the most commonly recognized definition of bullying includes repeated, unwanted aggressive behavior over a period of time with an imbalance of power between the bully and the victim. In theory, that also covers cyberbullying, but some have taken a broader approach to cyberbullying to also include single or occasional episodes of a person insulting another person online. Indeed, because of the possibility of it being forwarded, a single episode of online harassment can have long-term consequences. Manifestations of cyberbullying include name calling, sending embarrassing pictures, sharing personal information or secrets without permission, and spreading rumors. It can also include trickery, exclusion, and impersonation. So, do these threats mean that we should try to discourage the use of social networking sites for students?
Tynes (2007) suggests that the benefits of social networking sites for students far outweigh the dangers. Tynes believes we do students a disservice when banning them from social networking sites (as if we really could!). Social networking offers students invaluable opportunities for cognitive and psychosocial development. Tynes offers practical alternatives to banning students from social networks: 1) Maintain open and honest dialogue. Parents and teachers need to talk frankly with teens about the risks and benefits associated with the internet. Research indicates that girls who discuss internet safety with a teacher are less likely to agree to meet in person with a stranger encountered online. 2) Help youths protect their privacy online. Encourage the use of privacy settings on social networking sites. 3) Develop an exit strategy. Help kids recognize unsafe behaviors, warn/block suspicious persons, and report threatening behavior to authorities. We need to provide students with the tools that will keep them safe on the internet—not attempt to keep them away from the internet.
Media literacy and critical thinking “is protective against manipulation and harm” (Collier, 2009). See last week’s (week 5) blog entry for lots of information about critical thinking. Encouraging kids to practice good digital citizenship helps protect all young people, because “behaving aggressively online more than doubles the risk of being victimized.” Collier gives the formula:
Digital citizenship + media literacy = online safety 2.0
More information on what media literacy looks like can be found at Project New Media Literacies(NML), a research initiative based at MIT’s. NML explores how we might best equip young people with the social skills and cultural competencies required to become full participants in an emergent media landscape and raise public understanding about what it means to be literate in a globally interconnected, multicultural world.
identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation
plan and manage activities to develop a solution or complete a project
collect and analyze data to identify solutions and/or make informed decisions
use multiple processes and diverse perspectives to explore alternative solutions
All of these bullet points are very pertinent to nursing education and as I’ve mentioned in previous blog posts, critical thinking is a big buzz word for our discipline. The nursing process covers all the aspects mentioned above: assessment, diagnosis, outcome identification, planning, intervention, and evaluation. Nurses must identify and define the problems their clients’ present with by collecting and analyzing data with which to make informed decisions or diagnoses. Nurses investigate, plan, and manage activities around client needs and use multiple processes and diverse perspectives to explore solutions for clients. In short, nurses use critical thinking all the time!
This week we were also told to become familiar with online mapping software for brainstorming. It’s no surprise that cognitive mapping has been linked to improved critical thinking. Samawi (2006) reports on the effect of concept mapping on critical thinking skills in a quasi-experimental study of baccalaureate nursing students. The results suggest that concept mapping triggers critical thinking which guides the student to engage in meaningful learning. The mind maps the students created showed more complexity over time, allowing the researchers a means to evaluate the students’ evolving critical thinking skills. There are many free online mind-mapping tools available: Webspiration, Bubbl.us, and Mindmeister are a few. I signed up for Mindmeister and found it to be fairly intuitive (after a short video tutorial) although somewhat cumbersome to use. Feedback from classmates indicated that Bubbl.us had limitations as well. The Mindmeister tool allows for real-time collaboration showing each users work in a different color so you can track what’s happening. The maps are importable and exportable to other formats, allowing integration to a blog or other sites you may have.
It’s important to remember that critical thinking affects all forms of communication: speaking, listening, reading, and writing. Technology can enhance communication, but can too much technology be detrimental to critical thinking? A study at UCLA by Greenleaf (Wolpert, 2009) indicates that “as technology has played a bigger role in our lives, our skills in critical thinking and analysis have declined, while our visual skills have improved.” Learners have changed as a result of exposure to technology; reading for pleasure, which has declined among young people in recent decades, enhances thinking and engages the imagination in a way that visual media such as video games and television do not, Greenfield said. Greenfield recommends a “balanced media diet” in order to develop a variety of skills. No one medium is good for everything. I agree. As a non-traditional baccalaureate student a few years ago, I was introduced to mind-mapping much later in life than most. I find it a difficult task at best. Add in the challenges of new online technology and I find it overwhelming. If I must create a mind-map, I am probably going to utilize post-it notes and colored pencils. Let me apologize ahead of time to my instructors…
Samawi, Z. (2006). The effect of concept mapping on critical thinking skills and dispositions of junior and senior baccalaureate nursing students. The Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. Retrieved from http://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2006Papers/cmc2006-p159.pdf
This week we looked at WTS 1.1- Innovate: Demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology (OSPI, 2008). The class shared bookmarks on creative thinking, knowledge construction, and 21st century skills (the tag of the week). In addition, we were supposed to familiarize ourselves with Twitter micro-blogging tools. I was certainly familiar with creative thinking, comfortable enough with knowledge construction, and as luck would have it, had actually heard about Twitter (Twitter in Plain English). The concept I had to spend the most time getting acquainted with was 21st century education.
So what is 21st century education? “It is bold. It breaks the mold. It is flexible, creative, challenging, and complex. It addresses a rapidly changing world filled with fantastic new problems as well as exciting new possibilities” (21st Century Schools, nd). I loved how that sounded, but it didn’t tell me a whole lot. The definitive site for 21st century skills is The Partnership for 21st Century Skills(P21, 2009). P21 states they are the leading advocacy organization focused on infusing 21st century skills into education. P21 offers a document on 21st century outcomes for education that illiterates 21st century skills. So what are 21st century skills? The skills that will help us to thrive in an “increasingly diverse, globalized, and complex media-saturated society” (21st Century Schools, nd). These skills include:
creativity and innovation
critical thinking and problem solving
communication and collaboration
information media and ICT literacy
flexibility and adaptability
social and cross cultural skills
So, right away, there were some of the buzz words for the week: innovation and creative thinking. Well some of the bookmarks the class shared this week appeared to me to be truly innovative. Take Diigo, for example. A bookmarking tool like delicious but with the ability to highlight text (!) in the documents/sites you find, as well as the ability to attach sticky notes (!) and clip pictures. Take the tour! (Diigo) I found an innovative slideshare about creative thinking (visual and creative thinking) that defines creativity as the ability to use imagination to transcend traditional ideas, rules, patterns, relationships, or the like to create meaningful new ideas, forms, and methods. And, Teacher Tap is a professional development resource for educators that has a cool page on critical and creative thinking, including Bloom’s taxonomy. Neilsen (2009) offers Ten Ideas for Getting Started with 21st Century Teaching and Learning. Neilsen suggests that utilizing technology standards is a vital component of infusing technology into the curriculum (ISTE Education Technology Standards http://www.iste.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=NETS). Neilsen also recommends you join a social networking site (“You are NOT too old for facebook,” she says) such as Classroom 2.0., a social networking site for those interested in web 2.0 technologies in education.
I don’t want to intimate that 21st Century Skills are only attainable through technology. Certainly, technology is not an indispensable component of communication, problem solving, or creative thinking. However, being proficient (and innovative!) with technology is crucial to succeed in 21st Century environments. And let’s not forget that all this technology is supposed to lead to knowledge construction (the other buzz word of the week). Knowledge is not memorization of facts and figures, but is constructed through research and application, and connected to previous knowledge and personal experience.
So, how can we apply technology to knowledge construction? Well, collaboration is considered an excellent method for knowledge construction. Online discussion can provide the collaboration needed to accomplish knowledge construction. In Promoting Durable Knowledge Construction through Online Discussion, Knowlton (n.d.) gives practical advice, grounded in a framework of durable knowledge construction, to ensure that online discussions contribute to higher order thinking skills. I think we have all seen how online discussions can quickly digress to meaningless chit-chat, bland comments, and obvious glad-handing. Knowlton points out that quality online discussions leading to durable (lasting) knowledge don’t just happen. Educators must carefully design and facilitate online discussions. Knowlton proposes that effective online discussion questions fall into 3 categories: (1) Domains of Thinking Questions require students to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the types of problem solving approaches and knowledge construction mechanisms inherent to a specific field (i.e. scientific method). (2) Case Analysis Questions require students to apply course theories and concepts to specific, real world scenarios (used a lot in nursing) and (3) Introspective Questions based on issues of critical thinking and designed to encourage students to examine “how they learn.” Knowlton uses Bloom’s taxonomy to demonstrate the levels of learning to strive for in planning questions for online discussions. As a nurse educator, I can use Knowlton’s suggestions to craft case study discussion questions that will require critical and creative thinking and allow students to construct lasting knowledge.
References
Knowlton, D. (nd). Promoting durable knowledge construction through online discussion. Crichton College, Center for Distance Education and Learning Technologies. Retrieved October 23, 2009, from http://frank.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed01/11.html
Neilsen, L. (2009). Ten ideas for getting started with 21st century teaching and learning. Tech & Learning. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.techlearning.com/blogs/22558
In week 3 we looked at wikis as a tool for collaborative learning. Our focus was on OPSI educational technology standard 1.2 and the use of digital media and environments to communicate and work collectively to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others. Not surprising that the tag of the week was collaboration.
Beaufait, Lavin, & Tomei (2008) offer many defining tenets of collaboration such as: process oriented, learning groups, mutual responsibility, syntheses, and interdependence. Collaboration implies a high level of interdependence between learners; this interdependence is defined as “a dynamic of being mutually responsible to and dependent on others” (pg. 443). Wikipedia (the wikiest of wikis!) defines collaborative learning as “methodologies and environments in which learners engage in a common task in which each individual depends on and is accountable to each other.” Beaufait et al. believe that collaboration requires equality in participation, with genuine interactions between participants, and the synthesis of work into a unified whole. Used appropriately, a wiki can provide the framework for unification the authors describe. Wikis are collaborative environments by design; their structure is shaped from within rather than imposed from above (Engstrom & Jewett, 2005).
Benefits of collaborative learning include increasing the intellectual capacity of learners, critical thinking, and social and job skills (Beaufait et al., 2008). Critical thinking is a huge buzzword in nursing education and nursing is by nature a collaborative profession. Nurses are an integral part of a healthcare team and as such must be collaborative. I think a wiki for nurses and/or nurse educators would be a valuable tool. And guess what?! I discovered a nursing wiki that is touted as a free multilingual wiki project for healthcare and nursing information that anyone can edit. The wiki is driven by the nursing community and concentrates on nursing-specific content. This wiki is still fairly new, but a sponsoring “sister” wiki in Germany (PflegeWiki) has more than 5000 articles about different nursing topics. For example there are entries with concrete instructions (how to put on sterile gloves), special procedures (replacing a tracheal cannula), profiles of well-known nurses, information about diseases and anatomy, as well as nursing theories, nursing models, and articles about nursing science. Many articles contain photographs or other visual aids, which can also be freely used on home pages as well as for lectures as long as credit is given to PflegeWiki.
The collaboration of many nurses and nurse educators enrich the wiki with their specific expertise and experience, which are often missing from common nursing textbooks. Nursing students can publish their class notes and papers on the wiki and find the necessary information to prepare for exams or clinicals. Patients and their families can find information and share experiences. The wiki can allow users to develop new knowledge that is “shared and constructed rather than transmitted one way from teacher to students” (Beaufait et al., 2008). Collaborative teaching allows students and teachers to work together to “discover, create, and expand their understanding and skills. This is collaborative learning the wiki-way.
Engstrom, M. E., & Jewett, D. (2005). Collaborative learning the wiki way. Tech Trends, 49(6), 12-16. Retrieved October 16, 2009, from http://www.columbia.edu/~yc2154/013007/out-4.pdf
This week our class focused on blogs and RSS and the tag of the week was reflection. Many class members shared bookmarks on delicious for blogs about education, articles about blogging as an educational tool, and sites to use for setting up blogs. Edublog was a site frequently mentioned touting 10 ways to use education blogs to revolutionize how you teach and how your students learn. I found a fairly comprehensive article on using RSS in education that I shared with the group (D’Souza, 2009). After searching the internet, perusing many of my classmate’s sites and watching the videos posted on our course website, I felt I had a pretty good grasp of blogging and RSS. This was amazing in itself, because prior to this week I had never even noticed the little orange RSS icon, let alone known what it was about. I set up a Google Reader account and subscribed to many of my classmate’s blogs as was suggested. How cool that I can now see any new postings all in one place without having to go from blog to blog!
Tomei & Lavin (2008) offer my favorite definition of blogs as “personal websites operated by individuals who compile chronological lists of links to stuff that interests them, interspersed with information, editorializing, and personal asides” (p. 383). After gleaning a basic understanding and definition of blogs, I set out to determine what role blogs might play in nursing education. From learning to communicate within patient charts accurately and succinctly, to disseminating information on evidence-based practice with the goal of providing safer patient care, written communication is certainly a necessary component of health care. In The Potential Use of Blogs in Nursing Education, Maag (2005) writes, “The art of blogging can unleash the hidden capabilities of aspiring writers and motivate expression of thoughts, ideas, and interests in real time.” Maag points out that personal publishing via blogs can be an excellent educational practice because the medium promotes self-directed versus teacher-directed learning, encourages self-reflection as a model of social experience and self-identity, and enriches the process of learning.” This article really resonated with me because of the struggle I see within nursing education to embrace a more learner-centered model. Could blogging help nursing education move away from a teacher-directed, lecture driven format where we feed students information and evaluate learning through test after test after test?
The Maag article also resonated because it mentioned blogging to encourage self-reflection. There was the reflection word, aka the tag of the week. All of my courses at SPU have involved reflection and in my education courses we have discussed reflective journals as effective tools to enhance learning in the clinical environment. As students think and write about their clinical practice, they construct some of their own learning. I have been researching and learning about the benefit of journaling and summative student self-reflection as a means for retaining and learning material. Thinking inwardly, recognizing and acknowledging personal abilities and limits, asking questions and looking for bias or incomplete information in the answers are reflective stages that lay the foundation for the kind of learning necessary to nursing education and practice (DeYoung, 2009).
A review of the literature on the value of reflective journaling in undergraduate nursing education provides rationale and support for engaging undergraduate students in the reflective process; however there is evidence that educators struggle to incorporate reflective processes into education (Epp, 2008). The review concludes that nurse educators need to utilize various tools and strategies for facilitating the growth of undergraduate students into reflective practitioners. A reflective blog would certainly constitute such a tool.
DeYoung, S. (2009). Teaching strategies for nurse educators (2nd ed. ). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Epp, S. (2008). The value of reflective journaling in undergraduate nursing education: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1379-1388. Retrieved October 10, 2009, from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748908000266
The first week of the course has been somewhat overwhelming and thoroughly eye-opening. Knowing that we are all pioneering a new course design utilizing open tools rather than a desktop tool such as blackboard helps assuage some of my fear and create excitement. The pioneer spirit prevails! I realized right away that I am really a novice. Somehow, I had escaped any previous knowledge of web 2.0. The Go2Web20.net site displaying tiles of so many various 2.0 tools was mind boggling. The readings this week helped me to realize there is a whole new (for me) world of tech available for use in education (Cobb, 2008; Grush, 2008).
Okay, so I had heard about Facebook and MySpace, but had not been exposed to the term social networking in regard to these sites. According to Cobb (2008), “learning should be accessible and manageable through a personal learning environment,” that can be made available through social networking. I am intrigued by the personal learning environment (PLE) and look forward to learning more in the weeks ahead. In the article The Future of Web 2.0 (Grush, 2008), Gary Brown from WSU discusses PLEs as a possible alternative to the e-portfolio. Brown recognizes that e-portfolios are generally institution specific and are often used primarily as an assessment tool to monitor assignments. Brown believes the process needs to be truly student centered/driven. Utilizing web 2.0 tools allows students to “mash up a variety of applications, the results of which they own themselves and can make available to anyone” (pg. 2).
I was not aware social bookmarking was available with tools such as delicious. I had not even heard of social bookmarking! What a great tool allowing access to bookmarks from any computer and making it possible to form a network of users to expand bookmarking sites for specific educational purposes. I am interested in high fidelity simulation (SIM) experiences to help nursing students with technical skills acquisition. This is a fairly new field and instructors are struggling to get teams on board and find the time to develop SIM modules. Social bookmarking could provide a network of resources that can be readily shared by nurse educators striving to utilize the new SIM technology. When I figure out how to upload and imbed some links, videos, and such, I will provide some SIM information in my blog. Having never blogged before, just creating the blog site with categories, pages, and tags has been a huge step forward in the quest for technology in my educational endeavors.
This blog will allow me the opportunity to reflect each week on learning through the course EDTC 6535: Issues and Advances in Education Technology. Reflections will focus on the learning objectives and what I have learned and what I still want to learn about the weekly topics.